Training records must be maintained, revlecting the level of the operator (Full Access or Less Than Full Access), the date the operator completed CLETS training and the date the operator completed the workbook. The completed workbook should be kept by the operator as reference material. In Section Two, Full Access operators must complete the chapters on Record Maintenance and CLETS, and then those chapters of the workbook related to their job assignments. Because some individuals access selected databases only, ALL operators must complete the chapters on General Policies and Liability/Security Issues, CLETS, Criminal Justice Information System (CJIS), and then those chapters of the workbook related to their job assignment. As the operator completes a chapter of the workbook, review that chapter and record the completed date on the appropriate Completion Log in that section. The Full Access operator MUST complete Sections One and Two. Each section of the workbook is clearly marked, i.e., Section One Combined and Section Two Full Access. This telecommunications workbook is designed to meet the aforementioned requirements and combines BOTH the FULL ACCESS and the LESS THAN FULL ACCESS workbooks into one document. A Less Than Full Access (Inquiry) Operator has a CLETS User ID and password and only makes inquiries into the systems. A Full Access (Update) Operator is defined as an operator who has a CLETS User ID and password and makes inquiries into the systems and/or performs update functions. INTRODUCTION INSTRUCTIONS FOR AGENCY CLETS COORDINATORS, TRAINING OFFICERS AND/OR SUPERVISORS The California Law Enforcement Telecommunications System (CLETS) Policies, Practices and Procedures (PPPs) (Section 1.8 – Training) and the National Crime Information Center (NCIC) Operating Manual (Section 3 – Quality Control, Validation, and Other Procedures) state the following regarding CLETS/NCIC training: Initially (within six months of employment or assignment) train, functionally test, and affirm the proficiency of terminal (equipment) operators (FULL ACCESS/LESS THAN FULL ACCESS) in order to ensure compliance with CLETS/NCIC policies and regulations. From a coherence perspective, this Article then argues that the "property" protected under Measure 37 created internal conflicts throughout the law, piecing property rights apart from property duties in land uses, rendering incoherent the bundle of existing property expectations.CALIFORNIA LAW ENFORCEMENT TELECOMMUNICATIONS SYSTEM (CLETS) LESS THAN FULL ACCESS OPERATOR WORKBOOK July 2011Ĭalifornia Department of Justice Client Services Program KAMALA D. This Article compares the Measure to traditional property doctrines and property rights in property uses, focusing on the manner in which Measure 37 required a restructuring of property by reallocating property rights among competing claims. Using Measure 37 as a leaping point, this Article inquires into the relationship between compensation statutes and the property such legislation purports to protect. Although the efforts of compensation statutes may appear reasonable at first glance, a closer examination reveals difficulties in implementing such schemes. Compensation statutes (such as Oregon's Measure 37) attempt to elevate the importance of private property by insulating property value from any negative effects that land use regulations may have, typically by awarding compensation where property owners are required to suffer limitations in their land use choices.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |